Using Concessive Clauses to Soften Rebuttals

<callout icon="💡" color="blue"> TL;DR 🎯 Concessive clauses (물론 ~지만, ~기는 하지만, ~긴 하지만, ~다는 건 인정하지만) let you acknowledge the opposing point BEFORE delivering your rebuttal — making your counter-argument sound mature, measured, and highly credible.

</callout>

<callout icon="📌" color="yellow"> Helper Note 🗒️ A concession is NOT weakness — it's a persuasion technique! When you say "Of course X is valid... BUT Y," the listener's guard goes down because you acknowledged their point. Your rebuttal then lands harder and more convincingly. 🎭 This is one of the most powerful skills in formal Korean speaking!

</callout>

🔑 Big Picture

In any debate, presentation, or professional discussion, you'll need to push back on ideas. The question is: HOW you push back matters as much as WHAT you say. 🎯

Weak pushback sounds like: "아니요, 틀렸습니다." (No, that's wrong.)

Strong pushback sounds like: "물론 그 점도 타당합니다. 그러나 다른 관점에서 보면..." (Of course that's valid. However, from another perspective...)

The second version does three things simultaneously:

🤝 Earns goodwill by acknowledging the other person
🧠 Shows intelligence by engaging with their argument
🏆 Wins more convincingly because the rebuttal is framed as balanced, not combative

🧩 Core Concepts

Concessive Structure ⚙️	Meaning 💬	Register 🎩
물론 ~지만	Of course... but	Semi-formal to formal
~기는 하지만	While it is true that... / Although...	Formal
~긴 하지만 (casual form)	While it is... but (spoken shorthand)	Casual to semi-formal
~다는 건 인정하지만	I acknowledge that... but	Formal, debate-style
~는 점은 이해하지만	I understand the point that... but	Formal, empathetic
비록 ~더라도 / ~일지라도	Even if... / Even though...	Formal, written/spoken

🔑 Full pattern:

[Concession: acknowledge opposing view] + [Contrast connector] + [Your rebuttal]

Pattern 📝	Example 💬
물론 A지만, B이다	물론 비용이 높기는 하지만, 장기적 효과는 확실합니다.
A기는 하지만, B이다	그 방법이 효율적이기는 하지만, 안전성에 문제가 있습니다.
A다는 건 인정하지만, B이다	그 주장에 일리가 있다는 건 인정하지만, 실행 가능성이 낮습니다.
비록 A더라도, B이다	비록 시간이 걸리더라도, 올바른 절차를 따르는 것이 중요합니다.

✅ Exam Strategy

🎯 When asked to counter an argument in TOPIK Speaking or a formal setting:

Never start with flat denial ❌ — "아니요, 틀렸습니다" loses points
Open with a concession ✅ — "물론 그 점은 타당합니다. 그러나..."
Signal the turn 🔄 — 그러나, 하지만, 그럼에도 불구하고 signal your rebuttal is coming
State your counter-argument 🎯 — clear, specific, supported
Land your position 🏆 — "따라서 저는 ~라고 생각합니다" (Therefore I believe...)

✏️ Power move: The more specific your concession ("I acknowledge THAT specific point"), the more credible your rebuttal sounds.

⚠️ Pitfalls

❌ Over-conceding: Spending too long on the concession weakens your rebuttal. Keep the concession short — one sentence max.

❌ Forgetting the rebuttal: 물론 ~지만 MUST be followed by your counter-point. Never end on the concession alone!

😬 Casual vs. formal confusion:

~긴 하지만 = casual spoken shorthand ✅ for friends / ❌ for formal presentations
~기는 하지만 = formal spoken/written ✅ for presentations and debates

🗣️ Dialogue Patterns

Pattern 1 — 물론 ~지만 (Basic Concession) 🌿

🗣️ A: "이 프로젝트는 비용이 너무 많이 듭니다."

💬 B: "물론 초기 비용이 높은 건 사실입니다. 그러나 장기적 관점에서 보면 이 투자는 충분한 수익을 낼 수 있습니다."

Translation: "This project costs too much." / "Of course, the initial cost is high — that's true. However, from a long-term perspective, this investment can generate sufficient returns."

Pattern 2 — ~기는 하지만 (Formal Acknowledgment) 🎓

🗣️ A: "그 방법이 더 효율적이지 않나요?"

💬 B: "효율적이기는 하지만, 안전 기준을 충족하지 못한다는 점에서 실용적이라고 보기 어렵습니다."

Translation: "Isn't that method more efficient?" / "While it is efficient, it fails to meet safety standards, so it's difficult to consider it practical."

Pattern 3 — ~다는 건 인정하지만 (Debate-Grade) 🏆

🗣️ A: "재택근무가 생산성을 낮춥니다."

💬 B: "재택근무가 일부 경우 생산성에 영향을 준다는 건 인정합니다. 그럼에도 불구하고, 유연성 확보와 삶의 질 향상이라는 측면에서 장점이 더 크다고 생각합니다."

Translation: "Remote work lowers productivity." / "I acknowledge that remote work can affect productivity in some cases. Nevertheless, I believe the advantages in terms of flexibility and quality of life are greater."

Pattern 4 — 비록 ~더라도 (Strong Concession) 💪

💬 B: "비록 단기적으로는 손실이 발생하더라도, 장기적인 브랜드 가치를 위해 이 투자는 반드시 필요합니다."

Translation: "Even if there are short-term losses, this investment is essential for long-term brand value."

🧠 Nuance Bank

Goal 🎯	Best Concessive 🗣️	Why 💡
Quick, light concession	물론 ~지만	Short, natural, effective
Formal acknowledgment of a specific point	~기는 하지만	Academic, formal register
Debate-level concession with full acknowledgment	~다는 건 인정하지만	Shows you've heard AND engaged
Hypothetical concession (even if)	비록 ~더라도 / ~일지라도	Covers future/hypothetical scenarios
Empathetic concession (I understand that...)	~는 점은 이해하지만	Shows empathy before counter

🔖 Try this exercise

Q1. 🌿 "물론 그 점은 타당합니다. 그러나..." — What type of sentence structure is this?

① Cause and effect

② Chronological ordering

③ Concessive clause (acknowledge then counter)

④ Question and answer

<summary>Answer

③ — This is a concessive structure: acknowledge the opposing point (물론 ~) then counter with 그러나. ✅

Q2. 💬 Fill in: "비용이 많이 드는 건 사실이지만, __ 투자할 가치가 있습니다."

① 왜냐하면

② 그러므로

③ 그럼에도 불구하고

④ 따라서

<summary>Answer

③ — "It's true the cost is high, but NEVERTHELESS it's worth investing." 그럼에도 불구하고 = "nevertheless / despite that." ✅

Q3. 🎓 Which concessive structure sounds the MOST formal and debate-appropriate?

① 물론이죠, 근데요

② 긴 하지만

③ ~다는 건 인정하지만

④ 그건 그런데

<summary>Answer

③ — "I acknowledge that... but" is the most formal and debate-grade concession. It shows full engagement with the opposing argument. 🏆

Q4. 🤝 Why is starting a rebuttal with a concession more effective than flat denial?

① It takes more time

② It earns goodwill, shows intelligence, and makes the rebuttal land harder

③ It agrees with the opponent

④ It avoids making a counter-argument

<summary>Answer

② — Concession disarms the opponent and audience, making your subsequent rebuttal more credible and persuasive. 🧠

Q5. ⚠️ What's the risk of OVER-conceding?

① You'll sound too confident

② You'll spend too long acknowledging and weaken or forget your rebuttal

③ You'll be too formal

④ You'll agree completely

<summary>Answer

② — Keep concessions short (one sentence). The whole point is to set up your rebuttal, not to endorse the opposing view. ⚠️

Q6. 💪 What does 비록 ~더라도 express?

① A cause-and-effect relationship

② A hypothetical concession: "Even if [X happens], [Y is still true]"

③ A chronological sequence

④ A direct agreement

<summary>Answer

② — 비록 ~더라도 = "even if... / even though..." — used for hypothetical or strong concessions. "Even if there are losses, we should proceed." ✅

Q7. 📝 "효율적이기는 하지만, 안전성에 문제가 있습니다." — Identify the two parts:

① Concession = safety issue; Rebuttal = efficiency

② Concession = it's efficient; Rebuttal = but there's a safety problem

③ Both parts are agreeing

④ This is a question

<summary>Answer

② — Concession: "while it is efficient" (기는 하지만) → Rebuttal: "there's a safety problem." Classic concessive clause structure. ⚙️

Q8. 🗣️ Which is the casual/spoken shorthand of ~기는 하지만?

① ~지만

② ~긴 하지만

③ ~는데

④ ~더라도

<summary>Answer

② — ~긴 하지만 is the spoken shorthand (contraction) of ~기는 하지만. Appropriate in casual speech; use the full form in formal settings. ✅

Q9. 🏆 What should always FOLLOW a concession?

① Another concession

② A question

③ Your actual rebuttal or counter-argument

④ An apology

<summary>Answer

③ — The concession sets up the rebuttal. Without the rebuttal, the concession is just agreement! 물론 ~지만 → YOUR POINT. 🎯

Q10. 💬 Complete this debate opener: "그 주장에 일리가 있다는 건 __, 실행 가능성이 낮다는 점도 고려해야 합니다."

① 모르지만

② 인정하지만

③ 동의하고

④ 무시하지만

<summary>Answer

② — "I acknowledge that there's merit to that argument, but we also need to consider the low feasibility." 인정하다 = to acknowledge/admit. 🏆

🛠️ Speaking Formula

🌿 Quick concession formula:

물론 [opposing point]은/는 사실입니다. 그러나 [your counter-argument].

"Of course [opposing point] is true. However [your counter-argument]."

🎓 Formal acknowledgment formula:

[Claim] + 기는 하지만, [your counter-argument].

"While [claim] is true, [counter-argument]."

🏆 Debate-grade formula:

[Claim]다는 건 인정합니다. 그럼에도 불구하고, [your stance].

"I acknowledge that [claim]. Nevertheless, [your stance]."

💪 Hypothetical formula:

비록 [X]더라도, [Y]는 여전히 중요합니다.

"Even if [X], [Y] is still important."

🏁 Landing formula:

따라서 저는 [position]이 더 적합하다고 생각합니다.

"Therefore I believe [position] is more appropriate."

📌 Remember

🌿 물론 ~지만 = quick, natural concession — "Of course... but"

🎓 ~기는 하지만 = formal academic acknowledgment — "While it is true that..."

🏆 ~다는 건 인정하지만 = debate-grade concession — "I acknowledge that... but"

💪 비록 ~더라도 = hypothetical concession — "Even if..."

⚠️ Keep concessions SHORT — one sentence max — then pivot to your rebuttal!

😊 In Korean debate culture, conceding specific points makes you sound MORE persuasive, not weaker!

🎯 Practice Hub

Q1. 🌿 What is the purpose of a concessive clause in a rebuttal?

① To agree with the opponent

② To acknowledge their point before countering it — making your rebuttal more credible

③ To end the argument

④ To summarize both sides

<summary>Answer

② — Concessive clauses = acknowledge + counter. The acknowledgment disarms, the counter persuades. 🧠

Q2. 💬 "물론 그 방법에도 장점이 있습니다. 그러나..." — What kind of structure is this?

① Cause and effect

② Concessive clause introducing a rebuttal

③ Topic transition

④ Data comparison

<summary>Answer

② — 물론 ~지만/그러나 = classic concessive opening for a rebuttal. ✅

Q3. 🎓 Which is the most formal concessive expression?

① 긴 하지만

② 그건 그렇고

③ ~다는 건 인정하지만

④ 뭐, 그런데

<summary>Answer

③ — "I acknowledge that... but" is the most formal, debate-appropriate concession structure. 🏆

Q4. ⚙️ Fill in: "비용이 높__ 불구하고, 이 투자는 필요합니다."

① 기는 하지만

② 기는 하지만에도

③ 에도

④ 더라도에도

<summary>Answer

③ — "비용이 높은 것에도 불구하고" or simply "비용이 높음에도 불구하고" — ~에도 불구하고 = "despite / in spite of." ✅

Q5. 😊 Which phrase is the casual spoken shorthand of ~기는 하지만?

① 물론이지만

② 그러나

③ 긴 하지만

④ 이기는 해도

<summary>Answer

③ — ~긴 하지만 is the casual contraction. "빠르긴 하지만..." = "It's fast, but..." 🗣️

Q6. 💼 You're rebutting a colleague's proposal. Which opening is MOST sophisticated?

① "그 제안은 틀렸습니다."

② "물론 그 제안에도 장점이 있습니다. 그러나 비용 대비 효율성 측면에서 개선이 필요합니다."

③ "동의합니다. 끝."

④ "잘 모르겠습니다."

<summary>Answer

② — Acknowledge the proposal's merits first, then present your concern. Classic professional concession. 🤝

Q7. 🏆 After a full concession and rebuttal, what should you add to close strongly?

① Another concession

② "따라서 저는 ~이 더 적합하다고 생각합니다."

③ An apology

④ A question to the opponent

<summary>Answer

② — "따라서 저는 [position]이 더 적합하다고 생각합니다" = "Therefore I believe [position] is more appropriate." Land your conclusion clearly! 🎯

Q8. 💪 "비록 단기 손실이 있더라도, 장기 가치는 확보됩니다." — What is 비록 ~더라도 doing?

① Confirming the short-term loss is fine

② Conceding a hypothetical negative (short-term loss) while asserting the bigger positive (long-term value)

③ Agreeing with the opponent

④ Avoiding commitment

<summary>Answer

② — "Even if there are short-term losses, long-term value is secured." 비록 ~더라도 = hypothetical concession — "even if X, Y still holds." ✅

Q9. 🌿 Fill in: "물론 그 주장에 __ 있습니다. 그러나 다른 관점도 고려해야 합니다."

① 일리가

② 없는 게

③ 문제가

④ 틀린 게

<summary>Answer

① — "물론 그 주장에 일리가 있습니다" = "Of course there's merit to that argument." 일리 = merit/reason/logic. ✅

Q10. 🎓 Which is the CORRECT use of ~기는 하지만?

① "효율적이기는 하지만 안전성이 문제입니다." ✅

② "효율적이기는 하지만 효율적입니다."

③ "기는 하지만 효율적입니다."

④ "효율적이기는 효율적이지만."

<summary>Answer

① — "효율적이기는 하지만 안전성이 문제입니다" = "While it's efficient, safety is a problem." This is the correct structure. ✅

Q11. 🏆 "~다는 건 인정하지만" requires what kind of clause before 인정하다?

① A question

② A statement of the opposing claim (in quotation form ~다는)

③ An emotional expression

④ A future action

<summary>Answer

② — The structure is: [opposing claim + 다는] + 건 인정하지만 = "I acknowledge that [opposing claim], but..." ⚙️

Q12. 💬 What makes ~는 점은 이해하지만 different from ~기는 하지만?

① They are identical

② ~는 점은 이해하지만 adds empathy ("I understand the point that..."); ~기는 하지만 is more neutral acknowledgment

③ ~는 점은 이해하지만 is for casual speech

④ ~기는 하지만 is more empathetic

<summary>Answer

② — 이해하지만 = "I understand that..." — adds an empathetic layer. 기는 하지만 = more neutral acknowledgment of a fact. 🤝

Q13. 📝 Construct a sentence: You want to say "While the proposal is innovative, the budget is a concern."

① "제안이 혁신적이지만 예산이 걱정입니다." (acceptable)

② "제안이 혁신적이기는 하지만, 예산 문제가 우려됩니다." (formal, preferred)

③ Both ① and ② are correct; ② is more formal

④ Neither is correct

<summary>Answer

③ — ① works casually; ② is the formal preferred version using ~기는 하지만. In formal Korean settings, ② is stronger. ✅

Q14. 😊 In Korean debate culture, a concession is seen as:

① A sign of weakness or uncertainty

② A sign of maturity and intellectual sophistication

③ An admission of defeat

④ Irrelevant to winning an argument

<summary>Answer

② — Acknowledging the opposing view shows balanced thinking — a mark of maturity and sophistication in Korean professional discourse. 🎓

Q15. 🔄 What is the contrast connector typically used AFTER a concession to introduce the rebuttal?

① 그래서 / 왜냐하면

② 그러나 / 하지만 / 그럼에도 불구하고

③ 그리고 / 또한

④ 반면에 (alone)

<summary>Answer

② — 그러나, 하지만, and 그럼에도 불구하고 are the key contrast connectors that signal the rebuttal is coming after the concession. 🔄

Q16. 🌿 "물론 단기적으로는 비용이 큰 건 사실입니다. __, 장기적으로 보면 이 투자는 반드시 필요합니다."

① 따라서

② 그러나

③ 왜냐하면

④ 그리고

<summary>Answer

② — "Of course in the short term the cost is high — that's true. HOWEVER, looking long-term, this investment is absolutely necessary." 그러나 = however. ✅

Q17. 💪 When would you use 비록 ~더라도 instead of 물론 ~지만?

① When the concession is about present facts

② When the concession is about future possibilities or hypothetical scenarios

③ When you're casual

④ When you agree fully

<summary>Answer

② — 비록 ~더라도 = "even if [X happens]" — used for hypothetical or future scenarios. 물론 ~지만 = acknowledging existing/current facts. ⚙️

Q18. 🎓 "그 주장에 일리가 있다는 건 인정합니다. 그럼에도 불구하고, 저는 반대 의견을 가지고 있습니다." — Identify the structure:

① Simple agreement

② Concession → contrast connector → counter-position

③ Question → answer

④ Comparison of two things

<summary>Answer

② — Concession (인정합니다) → contrast (그럼에도 불구하고) → counter (반대 의견). This is the full debate-grade rebuttal structure. 🏆

Q19. 💼 You're in a meeting. Your boss says the new system is too expensive. You disagree. Which response is most professional?

① "아니요, 비용이 아무 문제 없습니다."

② "물론 초기 비용이 높은 건 사실입니다. 그러나 장기적으로 인건비를 절감할 수 있어 전체적인 비용은 줄어들 것입니다."

③ "그건 그렇고 다른 얘기 하시죠."

④ "동의합니다."

<summary>Answer

② — Concede the initial cost concern, then reframe with the long-term savings argument. Respectful and persuasive. 💼

Q20. 🌿 How long should a concession ideally be?

① As long as possible to show respect

② One sentence — then pivot to the rebuttal immediately

③ No specific length needed

④ At least three sentences

<summary>Answer

② — One sentence. The concession sets up the rebuttal; it should not overshadow it. Short concession → strong rebuttal. ⚠️

Q21. 📝 Fill in: "비록 완벽하지 않__, 이 방법이 현재 상황에서는 최선입니다."

① 더라도

② 기는 하지만

③ 다는 건 인정하지만

④ 는 점은 이해하지만

<summary>Answer

① — "비록 완벽하지 않더라도" = "Even if it's not perfect" — 비록 ~더라도 is the correct structure for hypothetical concession. ✅

Q22. 💬 Which is the most EMPATHETIC concession opener?

① 물론 ~지만

② ~기는 하지만

③ ~는 점은 이해하지만

④ ~다는 건 인정하지만

<summary>Answer

③ — "I understand the point that..." (이해하다 = to understand) adds an empathetic dimension beyond simple acknowledgment. Best for sensitive discussions. 🤝

Q23. 🏆 You want to rebut: "재택근무가 생산성을 낮춥니다." Choose the BEST concessive rebuttal:

① "아니요, 재택근무가 생산성을 높입니다."

② "재택근무가 일부 경우 생산성에 영향을 줄 수 있다는 건 인정합니다. 그러나 전반적인 삶의 질 향상과 유연성 확보 면에서 장점이 더 크다고 생각합니다."

③ "동의합니다."

④ "그건 틀린 말입니다."

<summary>Answer

② — Full ~다는 건 인정합니다 concession + 그러나 + well-reasoned counter-argument. This is the debate-grade answer. 🏆

Q24. 🎓 "따라서 저는 ~이 더 적합하다고 생각합니다" — when does this appear?

① At the start of a speech

② After the concession

③ After the full rebuttal, as the conclusion/position statement

④ In the middle of a concession

<summary>Answer

③ — "따라서 저는..." = "Therefore I believe..." — this is the landing phrase AFTER you've completed your concession + rebuttal. 🎯

Q25. 🌿 Complete: "물론 그 방안이 창의적이기는 하지만, __."

① 창의적인 것도 사실입니다

② 실현 가능성에 대한 검토가 필요합니다

③ 창의적이어야 합니다

④ 물론입니다

<summary>Answer

② — "Of course the plan is creative, but feasibility needs to be examined." A concrete, professional rebuttal after the concession. ✅

Q26. ⚙️ "효율적이기는 하지만" — what does the ~기는 part add to 하지만?

① It adds a question mark

② It nominalizes the adjective to acknowledge it as a valid characteristic before contrasting

③ It makes it past tense

④ It makes it more casual

<summary>Answer

② — ~기는 하지만 = acknowledges [adjective/verb] AS A FACT before contrasting. It's more nuanced than a simple 지만. "It IS efficient, but..." vs. "It's efficient, but..." ⚙️

Q27. 💼 In a business presentation, which sequence would earn the most respect from Korean colleagues?

① State your position → Deny opposing view → End

② Concede specific opposing point → Signal contrast → State your counter → Conclude with "따라서..."

③ Ask the audience to agree with you

④ Present only supporting evidence without acknowledging concerns

<summary>Answer

② — The full professional sequence: concede → contrast → counter → conclude. 🏆

Q28. 😊 "그 점은 이해하지만, 저는 다른 접근 방식을 제안드리고 싶습니다." — What is the speaker doing?

① Agreeing completely

② Offering empathy (이해하다) before proposing an alternative approach

③ Criticizing the other person

④ Ending the discussion

<summary>Answer

② — "I understand that point, but I'd like to suggest a different approach." Empathetic concession + constructive alternative. Very professional. 🤝

Q29. 🔄 "그럼에도 불구하고" vs. "그러나" — both signal contrast. What's the difference?

① They are identical

② 그럼에도 불구하고 = "nevertheless/despite all that" — stronger, implies overcoming something; 그러나 = "however" — general contrast

③ 그러나 is only written

④ 그럼에도 불구하고 is only spoken

<summary>Answer

② — 그럼에도 불구하고 carries more weight — "despite everything I just acknowledged, my position is..." 그러나 is a lighter "however." Both work; the former is stronger after a major concession. ✅

Q30. 📝 Which sentence correctly uses ~는 점은 이해하지만?

① "이해하는 점은 하지만 비용이 많습니다."

② "비용이 부담스럽다는 점은 이해하지만, 이 투자의 필요성은 분명합니다."

③ "이해합니다 점은 하지만."

④ "점은 이해하지만 비용을 이해합니다."

<summary>Answer

② — "I understand the point that the cost is burdensome, but the necessity of this investment is clear." Correct structure: [situation + 다는 점은] 이해하지만, [counter]. ✅

Q31. 🎓 A TOPIK examiner is most impressed when a student:

① States only their own view without acknowledgment

② Uses 물론 ~지만 to acknowledge opposing view before rebutting

③ Avoids taking any position

④ Disagrees flatly with every opposing point

<summary>Answer

② — Examiners reward nuance and balanced argumentation. 물론 ~지만 is a clear marker of advanced speaking ability. 🏆

Q32. 💪 "비록 실패 경험이 있더라도, 그 경험에서 배운 것이 오히려 더 큰 자산이 될 수 있습니다." — What is being conceded?

① Success

② The existence of failure experiences

③ The value of the failure

④ No concession is being made

<summary>Answer

② — The concession is: "Even if [you] have had failure experiences" — acknowledging the failure — then the rebuttal reframes those failures as assets. 💪

Q33. 🌿 Complete this rebuttal: "물론 그 방법이 빠르다는 건 인정합니다. __ 정확도 면에서 우리 방법이 우수합니다."

① 왜냐하면

② 그래서

③ 그러나

④ 그리고

<summary>Answer

③ — "Of course I acknowledge that method is faster. HOWEVER, in terms of accuracy, our method is superior." 그러나 signals the rebuttal. ✅

Q34. 😊 Why is ~다는 건 인정하지만 more powerful than 물론 ~지만?

① It's shorter

② It more explicitly acknowledges the specific claim being made, showing you've engaged deeply

③ It's more casual

④ It avoids the rebuttal

<summary>Answer

② — "I acknowledge THAT specific claim" shows you've fully engaged with the opponent's argument — not just given a generic concession. Deeper engagement = more persuasive. 🧠

Q35. 💼 You're pitching a new policy. A board member objects: "이 정책은 리스크가 너무 높습니다." Choose the best concessive rebuttal:

① "리스크가 없습니다."

② "물론 초기 리스크가 존재한다는 건 인정합니다. 그러나 리스크 완화 전략을 병행하면 충분히 관리 가능한 수준입니다."

③ "동의합니다."

④ "그건 고려하지 않았습니다."

<summary>Answer

② — Acknowledge the risk → present the mitigation strategy. Classic professional concession + counter. 💼

Q36. 🔄 What does "일리가 있다" mean in "그 주장에 일리가 있습니다"?

① The argument has no value

② The argument has merit / logic / reason

③ The argument is wrong

④ The argument is irrelevant

<summary>Answer

② — 일리 = merit / reasonable logic. "그 주장에 일리가 있습니다" = "That argument has merit." The concession acknowledges the opponent has a reasonable point. ✅

Q37. 🎯 Which two elements MUST be present in a complete concessive rebuttal?

① Apology + conclusion

② Concession (acknowledge opposing point) + Rebuttal (your counter-argument)

③ Data + opinion

④ Question + answer

<summary>Answer

② — Both elements are required. Concession alone = agreement. Rebuttal alone = combative. Together = sophisticated argumentation. 🏆

Q38. 📝 Translate using the correct structure: "Even if this plan isn't perfect, it's the best option we have right now."

① "이 계획이 완벽하지만 최선입니다."

② "비록 이 계획이 완벽하지 않더라도, 현재 우리에게 최선의 선택입니다."

③ "이 계획이 완벽하지 않아서 최선입니다."

④ "이 계획이 완벽하긴 합니다."

<summary>Answer

② — 비록 ~더라도 = "even if..." Perfect for this sentence. "Even if this plan isn't perfect, it's the best choice available to us right now." ✅

Q39. 😊 "그 우려를 충분히 이해합니다. 그럼에도 불구하고..." — what's the emotional register of this opening?

① Cold and dismissive

② Empathetic and measured — acknowledges the concern warmly before presenting the counter

③ Aggressive

④ Uncertain

<summary>Answer

② — "I fully understand that concern. Nevertheless..." — warm, empathetic opening that makes the rebuttal feel collaborative rather than combative. 🤝

Q40. 🎓 Fill in the blank to complete a full formal rebuttal structure:

"물론 [opposing point]은/는 사실입니다. __ [your position]이 더 중요하다고 생각합니다. __ 저는 [your stance]을/를 지지합니다."

① 그러나 / 따라서

② 왜냐하면 / 그래서

③ 그리고 / 또한

④ 반면에 / 하지만

<summary>Answer

① — 그러나 (however) signals the rebuttal; 따라서 (therefore) lands the conclusion. "Of course [X] is true. HOWEVER [Y] is more important. THEREFORE I support [stance]." 🏆

Q41. 🌿 In casual conversation, which form would you use instead of ~기는 하지만?

① 비록 ~더라도

② ~다는 건 인정하지만

③ ~긴 하지만

④ ~는 점은 이해하지만

<summary>Answer

③ — ~긴 하지만 is the casual spoken shorthand for ~기는 하지만. "빠르긴 하지만..." = "It's fast, but..." ✅

Q42. 💼 What's the value of saying "물론 그 우려는 타당합니다" before presenting your counter in a business meeting?

① It wastes time

② It validates the opponent's feeling, lowering defensiveness before your counter-argument

③ It means you agree completely

④ It ends the discussion

<summary>Answer

② — Validating the opposing concern ("that concern is valid") reduces tension and makes the audience more receptive to your rebuttal. 🤝

Q43. 📝 Choose the sentence with the BEST use of ~기는 하지만:

① "빠르기는 하지만 정확성이 떨어집니다."

② "빠른 기는 하지만이다."

③ "기는 하지만 빠릅니다."

④ "빠르기는 합니다하지만."

<summary>Answer

① — "It IS fast, but accuracy is lacking." Correct structure: [adjective stem] + 기는 하지만 + [contrasting fact]. ✅

Q44. 🏆 After a strong concession and rebuttal, what phrase closes the argument most impressively?

① "잘 모르겠습니다."

② "끝입니다."

③ "따라서 저는 [position]이/가 더 적합하다고 생각합니다."

④ "물론입니다."

<summary>Answer

③ — "따라서 저는 [position]이 더 적합하다고 생각합니다" = "Therefore I believe [position] is more appropriate." Clear, decisive, authoritative. 🏆

Q45. 🔍 Read: "비록 그 정책이 단기적으로 실업률을 높이더라도, 장기적으로는 더 건강한 경제 구조를 만들 것입니다." — What is being conceded?

① Long-term economic health

② The policy is bad overall

③ Short-term increase in unemployment

④ The policy should be cancelled

<summary>Answer

③ — The concession is: "even if the policy raises unemployment in the short term." The rebuttal: "it will create a healthier economy long-term." 💪

Q46. 💬 "그 주장의 타당성은 인정하면서도, 저는 다른 결론에 도달했습니다." — What does 인정하면서도 add?

① It denies the claim

② "While acknowledging / even while conceding" — a concession WITHIN the same clause, very sophisticated

③ It ignores the claim

④ It agrees with the conclusion

<summary>Answer

② — 인정하면서도 = "while acknowledging / even as I acknowledge" — concession embedded within a single clause. Advanced level structure. 🎓

Q47. 😊 Your friend argues that studying abroad is too expensive. You want to gently disagree. Choose the best response:

① "아니야, 비싸지 않아."

② "비용이 많이 드는 건 사실이야. 근데 장학금이나 아르바이트를 통해 충분히 커버할 수 있어."

③ "동의해."

④ "그건 틀린 말이야."

<summary>Answer

② — Casual but effective concession (비용 많이 드는 건 사실이야 = "it's true the cost is high") + rebuttal (scholarships/part-time work). 🌿

Q48. 🎭 What makes 그럼에도 불구하고 more powerful than 그러나 after a major concession?

① It's shorter

② 그럼에도 불구하고 = "despite ALL of what I just acknowledged" — carries the weight of the full concession; 그러나 is lighter

③ 그러나 is only for written Korean

④ They have opposite meanings

<summary>Answer

② — After a heavy concession, 그럼에도 불구하고 signals "despite ALL of that, my position stands." It acknowledges the full weight of what was conceded. 💪

Q49. 📊 Complete the full rebuttal: [Concession] "물론 그 분석에 타당한 부분이 있습니다." [Counter] __ [Conclusion] "따라서 저는 B안을 지지합니다."

① "그래서 A안이 맞습니다."

② "그러나 데이터를 면밀히 검토하면 B안이 더 효율적임을 알 수 있습니다."

③ "왜냐하면 A안이 맞습니다."

④ "그리고 B안도 좋습니다."

<summary>Answer

② — "Of course there are valid parts of that analysis. HOWEVER, on close examination of the data, Plan B proves more efficient. THEREFORE I support Plan B." 🏆

Q50. 🌟 Final challenge! Evaluate this complete argument and identify its structure:

"물론 A 방법이 비용 면에서 유리하다는 건 인정합니다. 그러나 장기적인 안정성과 품질을 고려할 때, B 방법이 더 적합합니다. 비록 초기 비용이 높더라도, 이 투자가 장기적으로 더 큰 가치를 창출할 것이라 확신합니다. 따라서 저는 B 방법을 지지합니다."

① Simple one-sided argument

② Full concessive rebuttal: acknowledge → counter → hypothetical concession → conclusion

③ Fact-check response

④ Topic transition using 그건 그렇고

<summary>Answer

② — This is the complete model: 물론 ~다는 건 인정합니다 (concession) → 그러나 (contrast/counter) → 비록 ~더라도 (hypothetical concession) → 따라서 (conclusion). Gold standard advanced argumentation. 🏆